Evaporative humidifiers
A fan pulling room air through a wet wick. The water leaves as vapour and the minerals stay behind in the wick, which is why it cannot make white dust and why the wick eventually goes stiff and white.
15 of them here from 8 brands, priced $60 to $1,000. The most capable is the Vornado EVDC500 Energy Smart at 3.5 gal/day — 862 sq ft of real coverage. The cheapest is the Vicks Cool Moisture V3900 at ~$60.
What to watch for: Wick cost across a season, an audible fan at the speeds that deliver the rated output, and output that drops as the wick scales up.

Vornado
Vornado EVDC500 Energy Smart
The EVDC300's larger sibling: same DC motor and single-watt idle, two tanks instead of one, and enough output to matter in a real living room. At 3.5 gallons a day it is the most capable tabletop Vornado makes, and its 840 sq ft figure again sits within a few percent of the load calculation. Fourteen hours at full output, so still a daily job in a dry house - but two tanks make that a lighter job than one. The question it poses against the Evap40 console is whether you would rather carry water twice a day and keep the floor space, or once a day and give up a corner.
862 sq ft supported · box says 840 sq ft

Vornado
Vornado EV200
Two tanks instead of one, two wicks instead of one, and 2.4 gallons a day against a 580 sq ft claim - within about two percent of the load calculation, one of several Vornado figures that land that close. Refilling means carrying two 0.75-gallon tanks rather than one heavy one, which sounds like a downgrade and is not: most people find two light trips easier than one awkward one, and you can run it on a single tank overnight. Fifteen hours at full output is the honest tank life, and Vornado does not pretend otherwise.
591 sq ft supported · box says 580 sq ft

Vornado
Vornado EVDC300 Energy Smart
A DC motor is the only interesting thing here and it is interesting enough to justify the model. On its Energy Smart setting the EVDC300 draws as little as a single watt, against the fourteen to forty-five watts Vornado's AC evaporatives pull, and it runs the whole winter for the price of a few coffees. Output is 2.3 gallons a day - within one percent of what its 560 sq ft claim actually needs - from a one-gallon tank, which is the catch: ten hours between fills if you run it hard. It is the fill interval, not the capability, that decides whether this or the two-tank EV200 is the right one.
567 sq ft supported · box says 560 sq ft

An air washer works by turning textured evaporator mats through a water bath: air passes over the wet surfaces, picks up moisture, and drops some dust on the way. The appeal is that the mats are washed rather than bought by the season - Boneco says they go in the dishwasher or the washing machine - though it does sell replacement mats. Boneco's technical data gives 350 grams an hour, which is 2.22 gallons a day and supports about 547 sq ft, so the 540 on the listing is one of the few coverage claims in this catalog that its own maker's output figure actually backs. The rest of the arithmetic is as plain: a 4.5-litre bath, one silver stick a year, no filters, and about thirteen hours between fills if you are running it at the room it claims.
547 sq ft supported · box says 540 sq ft

The long-running default in this category, and the arithmetic explains why. Honeywell's manual gives 2 gallons a day of output against the 500 sq ft it is sold for - a room that needs almost exactly that - making this one of the few portables in the catalog whose coverage number the physics supports outright. It was sold from 2011 largely unchanged until Honeywell discontinued it; the tank and tray go in the dishwasher, and it evaporates rather than atomises, so there is no white dust. The costs are a wick habit, a fan you can hear, and no humidistat at all: three speeds, and you are the humidistat.
493 sq ft supported · box says 500 sq ft

Honeywell
Honeywell HEV620 Top Fill Tower
Honeywell's answer to the two complaints levelled at the HCM-350: no digital humidistat, and a tank you have to carry upside down to the sink. The HEV620 is a tower with a top-fill opening, a digital humidistat that will actually hold a target, and a timer. Its 300 sq ft claim against 2 gallons a day of output is one of the most conservative ratios in the catalog - the output supports closer to 490 - which is worth knowing if you have been talked out of it by a spec-sheet comparison against an ultrasonic promising 750. Honeywell now sells it in black (HEV620B); the white HEV620W pictured is discontinued.
493 sq ft supported · box says 300 sq ft

Stadler Form
Stadler Form Oskar
A Swiss design-led cube that has been on sale, essentially unchanged, for over a decade - which in a category full of two-year model cycles is its own recommendation. Output is a published 1.9 gallons a day against a 540 sq ft claim; the load calculation supports about 470, so it overstates by fifteen percent, which is modest for this category. The tank is only 0.9 gallons, which at full output is about eleven hours. Eighteen watts at most, a real hygrostat, and a cube small enough to sit on a bookshelf.
468 sq ft supported · box says 540 sq ft

Where the VUL545 atomises, this one evaporates - a wick, a fan and a UV lamp in the reservoir. For anyone who bought a Vicks ultrasonic and then found white powder on the dresser, the V3900 is the same brand's answer, and it is the cheaper half of the answer compared with Honeywell's HCM-350. A gallon a day against a 400 sq ft claim overstates by about 60%, which is mild by the standards of this category. The wick is the ongoing cost, at roughly $14 every month or two, and the UV lamp treats the water in the tank rather than the air in the room.
246 sq ft supported · box says 400 sq ft

Vornado
Vornado EV100
Vornado prints room sizes that the physics actually backs up. One gallon a day supports about 246 square feet by the standard winter calculation; Vornado prints 260 on the box. That is not a rounding coincidence - the same relationship holds across their whole line, which means somebody there is doing the load calculation instead of the marketing. The EV100 itself is a plain, small, well-built evaporative: one gallon, one wick, automatic humidity control, and a five-year guarantee that is unusually long for the money. It will not humidify an open-plan floor, and Vornado does not claim it will.
246 sq ft supported · box says 260 sq ft

Take the HCM-350's mechanism and move the fill to the top: water goes in through a funnel on the lid, so nothing has to be carried to the sink, and that is most of what "Easy to Care" means. The trade is capacity: a 1-gallon tank against the 350's 1.1, no UV, and no humidistat here either. Neither Honeywell's manual nor its store page says any part is dishwasher safe, unlike the HCM-350, whose tank and tray are. At the 36 hours Honeywell claims it is moving two thirds of a gallon a day, which is a bedroom's worth; the 360 sq ft it is sold for would take closer to 1.5 gallons a day and drain the tank in about 16 hours.
165 sq ft supported · box says 360 sq ft

Canopy sells cleanability, and on that promise it delivers better than anything else here: tank, tray, cap and grille all go in the dishwasher, the filter is on a 45-day clock the machine reminds you about, and because it evaporates rather than atomises there is no mist to land on anything. What $159 does not buy is capacity or control. There is no humidistat, and 2.5 litres across the advertised 36 hours is under half a gallon a day - a figure that supports something closer to 110 square feet than the 500 on the listing. As a nightstand appliance for one person's immediate airspace it is excellent. As the 500 sq ft room humidifier the marketing describes, it is not close.
108 sq ft supported · box says 500 sq ft

Mechanically the Bedside 2.0 - same tank, filter, red light, nightlight and three soundscapes - sold with Canopy's baby-safe Little Dreams aroma kit and in nursery colours. The argument for it in a child's room is specific and good: no visible mist means nothing lands in a cot, no ultrasonic means no white dust in a room where a baby is breathing, and the dishwasher-safe parts mean the cleaning actually gets done at the interval it needs. The same capacity ceiling applies - this is one cot's worth of air, not a 500 sq ft nursery - and there is no humidistat to stop it when the room is where you want it.
108 sq ft supported · box says 500 sq ft

Eight watts at full speed, no wick and no filter - Venta's disc-stack airwasher costs a great deal up front and almost nothing to run, which is the whole argument for it. Its manual is also the only one in this catalog that states the assumption behind its room-size figure: "listed square feet are based on 8-foot ceilings". That single sentence is more transparency than the rest of the category manages combined. What Venta will not tell you is how much water it actually moves - no output rate appears in the manual or on the product page - so the 485 sq ft figure has nothing behind it that a buyer can check.

The LW25's larger sibling: a 3-gallon basin, the same disc stack and eight watts at full speed, sold for 645 sq ft. Like the LW25 it comes with no output rate - not on Venta's product page and not in the LW15/LW25/LW45 manual - so the 645 sq ft has nothing behind it a buyer can check; the three gallons a day some retailers quote belongs to the older Venta Original LW45. Venta has since moved on: its US store shows both colours out of stock and names the AH550/AH555 Original Connect as the newer model. No wick, a two-year limited warranty, and a basin you will have your hands in every couple of weeks.

A thousand dollars, and the humidifier is the third thing it does. The PH04 is primarily an air purifier with a formaldehyde-destroying catalytic filter and a fan, into which Dyson has fitted an evaporative humidifier with a UV-C water treatment stage and a deep-clean cycle. Judged as a humidifier it is modest: a 1.1-gallon tank, a 400 sq ft claim, and no published output rate at all, which for a company that publishes airflow in litres per second is a conspicuous omission. It belongs in this catalog because people cross-shop it, not because it is the best way to spend $1,000 on humidity.